Legal Stuff

This site is created through Blogger, so I am legally required to inform you this blog uses cookies. I'm not a techie, so I can't detail all the consequences, but you've been warned.
Showing posts with label Debates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debates. Show all posts

Sorry Jim, Albertans Know Better

Wednesday, 29 April 2015
DAMMIT, JIM!
Jim Prentice doesn't get it. And we're not sure he will. During an interview on Calgary's AM770 (CHQR) he turned on his interviewers and said the media needs to focus on issues that matter to Albertans, rather than issues like the disqualification of Jamie Lall over a restraining order stemming back from 2007 (a matter that had been resolved privately between Lall and his ex), yet allowing a member who solicited a prostitute in public. Also, not important to Albertans is Gordon Dirks' saying Albertans "Don't get it" and his condescending "Math is Hard" comment during the debates.

But, regardless of Mr. Dirks' assertions, it appears the PC leadership is the ones who don't get it. Mr. Prentice doesn't get to decide what issues matters to Albertans. Albertans decide. And if the governing party is acting completely irresponsible, condescending, entitled, or like characters in a mafia movie, then that is probably something Albertans should be concerned about. And if Prentice thinks blackballing deserving candidates to ensure your hand-picked guy doesn't have to contest a nomination, then maybe Prentice should look in the mirror.


THE PROGRESSIVE PROBLEM

Now, in light of that issue, that doesn't mean Prentice has to agree with Albertans on what's important. And I'll admit, there are some cases where I don't either. Maybe if I was more hardline, I would agree with some of them. A few examples that I could cite include the progressive Twitterverse constantly bringing up Christine Cusanelli's Olympic vacation. Now, people who follow me on Twitter probably view me as a Cusanelli apologist, and I'm not sorry that I'm proud to call her a friend and have the pleasure of working with her on poverty issues. Of course, I don't defend her spending decisions as a cabinet minister, but let's face the facts. She paid the money back before the press even broke the story. By the time it was reported, the matter had been completely resolved.

Now, if that Olympic decision is truly important to progressives, far be it from me to tell you otherwise. But sadly, the view I get on social media is that progressives are looking for any reason to attack any PC MLA or Candidate. I mean, really, we already have "Look in the Mirror," "Math is hard," "Albertans don't get it," "Buddy you're being set up..." We have the original bill 10, we have Prentice attempting to cut the charity tax benefit, we as progressives have lots of reasons to throw out Jim Prentice and the governing PC's. Bringing up something that happened 3 and a half years ago, was resolved AT THAT TIME, and then not even found by the media until two years ago... If it's important to you, then fine. Vote based on that premise. But the constant bringing it up on social media really makes progressives look scared and desperate. And that is the opposite of the message we want to send.

And for the record, to the guys who dropped the flyer in my mailbox mentioning "Was removed from Cabinet for spending taxpayer dollars on an Olympic Vacation." That's not correct. She paid it back within ten days upon returning. So everyone in the PCAA party knew already about it. While using the government expenditure as a credit card isn't responsible, even I'll admit that, she wasn't removed from cabinet for that. She was removed because the media reported it after the issue was resolved. Basically, she was thrown under the bus by Allison Redford. A premier who herself had her own share of taxpayer spending issues. And it is THAT kind of mafia-family government we don't want. And that is exactly why people have plenty of reasons to vote progressive.

FINAL WORD

Like my views or hate it, I am trying to raise money to attend the Canadian Alliance to End Homelessness. I had six years of lived experience in Calgary's shelter system and have been an advocating for better treatment of our city's most vulnerable, including discrimination. Please take the time to donate by clicking on the box on the top right side of the page, so I can attend the conference as a person with lived experience. If, after budgeting is done and my estimate is too high - or if I go beyond my fundraising goal - extra funds will go towards gifts for the Montreal Homeless Community.
Read more ...

Why the Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta Won't Debate

Thursday, 23 October 2014
This was originally posted on October 22nd, and was pulled down in light of terrorist attacks in my home country that occurred later that day, as I (and many others) felt it was not an appropriate time for partisan mud-slinging. The debates on October 22nd were held and Stephen Mandel did arrive as promised.



I don't know how many of you follow politics. This is a political and policy blog, so assume a few of you do. For those that do, there's a series of by-elections going on in Alberta. Four of them, to be precise. Last night, Gordon Dirks, the as-of-yet unelected Education Minister and the only member of the Progressive Conservatives running to actually attend a debate so far failed to show up for the debate among Calgary-Elbow candidates at Mount Royal University.

Premier Jim Prentice, who is also seeking a seat in this by-election in Calgary-Foothills was replaced by a pumpkin at an earlier debate, and the Edmonton-Whitemud candidate Stephen Mandel, a former Mayor of Edmonton who should know a thing or two about optics in the political arena failed to show up for a debate on October 20th. He has since committed to attend a debate on the 22nd. Mike Ellis has stated that he won't attend a debate scheduled for Calgary-West, but insists he would debate in any all-candidate debates held by community associations.

Right now they are saying they are out meeting "Real People" by door knocking instead of debating. That is fair, but a debate allows constituents to see all candidates at the same time, and compare side-by-side. And those who attend debates, I think are "real people" too. Especially the PC volunteers who are essentially fed to the wolves when they show up at these debates and their candidate isn't even there. Every time the PCs are brought up, everyone in the audience kind of eyes that table grudgingly. I have absolutely nothing but the highest of respect for those volunteers. Their candidates clearly matter to them. How much do they matter to their candidates?

So maybe there's another reason the PCs haven't been attending debates. With that, I bring you a list of reasons the PCs have not been attending debates:


  1. Candidates have locked themselves in their cars and don't have OnStar (TM) or couldn't get a hold of AMA on time. (thanks to @GerryBrant via Twitter for that one)
  2. They were worried there wouldn't be any seats left due to the vast amount of students who could afford post secondary tuition for the MRU debate.
  3. They intended to attend but the market corrected itself by removing them from the debate.
  4. Their budget projections missed the mark again and they couldn't afford gas.
  5. They were filling in at the legislature for all the MLA's who missed work to volunteer on their campaign.
  6. They honestly thought they were at the debates but couldn't tell the difference between their candidates and a pumpkin.
  7. They were so impressed by the pumpkin they hired it as a debate coach. The pumpkin, having no legs or pulse, never showed up at their office. The candidates thought the pumpkin was coaching by example
  8. They didn't think Mount Royal University could afford the debate until the next set of "market modifiers" gets approved.
  9. They were trying to sell airplanes to someone who contacted them via Kijiji (TM)
  10. Partying with Ke$ha
  11. Kicked to the floor by Ke$ha for not looking like Mick Jagger.
  12. Programmed their GPS with Stephen Harper's voice. Ended up in Syria.
  13. After a long day of campaigning, had to spend a long night fundraising.
  14. To help raise funds, the candidates agreed to test out new cloaking devices. They were actually there, and suffice it to say, the devices worked.
  15. To save costs and fulfill promises, Gordon Dirks was busy building a school by hand, Mandel was busy building a Hospital by hand, and Prentice was busy tearing down the Sky Palace and any trace Allison Redford ever existed within the party by hand.

If you have any more, tweet them with the hashtags #whypcaawontdebate or #wherespcaa

You can follow me on twitter at @nkirk4homeless
Read more ...